What Is A Knee Wall And How Can It Lower My Electric Bill

Low Electric Bill Knee Wall

What is a knee wall?
Look around your house and see if you have any raised or vaulted ceilings. If so, then you, likely, have knee walls.  A knee wall is a vertical wall in your attic that separates your attic from your house.

High Electricity Bill Knee Wall

On the other side of this uninsulated knee wall is a vaulted ceiling at the top of a stairway

When we think of insulating an attic we often overlook knee walls and the effect that they can have on the house. Many homeowners will add some blown in insulation on the deck floor of the attic and neglect the knee walls entirely. However, if you add up the surface area Read More

Posted Under: Energy Efficiency, Heating & Air | , , ,

Common Energy Savings Myths

Air leaking through a switchplate

I found this article on Home Energy Magazine’s website. It lays out a number of Energy Myths that we bump into when we meet with homeowners. A big thank you to Evan Mills for putting this article together.

Energy Myths

Energy and energy savings myths get passed around surprisingly rapidly, often with little scrutiny.

BY EVAN MILLS
January 01, 2001
SHARE

Energy and energy savings myths get passed around surprisingly rapidly, often with little scrutiny. But an examination of 13 common myths reveals that they should be treated with some healthy skepticism. Sometimes the basic premise of the myth is correct, but the energy savings are much smaller than people realize. In other cases, the myth is based on factors that were once true but have been subsequently resolved through better design or manufacturing of products. In all cases, the bottom line is that you should always think critically when you hear a “tip” on how to save energy–and dig a little deeper to separate the myths from the facts.

Myth: Buying an efficient air conditioner or furnace will automatically reduce my energy bill.

This is true to some extent, but you won’t realize all the possible savings if the equipment is not sized or installed properly. Studies have shown that typical air conditioner and duct systems are improperly installed, wasting one-third or more of the energy used by the air conditioner. New and replacement equipment (and ducts) need to be properly designed and installed to realize all the possible savings. The same caveats about proper installation hold true for insulation, windows, and many other energy efficiency upgrades.

Chris Here: I’d like to add 2 notes to this one. First, tests have shown that the average existing home HVAC system delivers 55% of it rated capacity. When a new one is installed, the average delivered capacity jumps to 57%. How that system is being designed and installed can bring that delivered capacity to 100%, however, most residential installations do not address all of the problems necessary to achieve that 100% delivered capacity ( our installation take all factors into account to deliver the best possible effectiveness). Second, often times homeowners will want to install a larger air-conditioning unit on their home believing that if it can cool the house faster, it will be cheaper to run. However, over-sizing a system leads to short-cycling and higher energy costs. 

Myth: Energy efficiency and energy conservation are one and the same thing.

Well-intentioned information campaigns during the oil crises of the 1970s created a lot of confusion about how to save energy and even about how to talk about saving energy. Energy efficiency means getting the same job done while using less energy. This could be lighting a room, cooling a house, or refrigerating some vegetables. The things made possible by using energy–such as illumination, comfort, or food preservation–are sometimes called energy services.

Energy conservation, on the other hand, means reducing the level of services, such as reducing lighting or comfort, or turning up the temperature of your fridge. Reducing service levels (conservation) does not necessarily mean sacrifice, however. For example, many spaces are overlit by current-day standards, many water heater temperatures are set too high, and so on. Consumers have the option of improving energy efficiency (such as through purchasing better appliances) and/or reducing service levels, but lowering the quality of life is not a prerequisite for reducing energy demand.

Myth: Duct tape is good for sealing ducts.

Unfortunately, laboratory research has concluded that duct tape has very low durability when used to seal ducts. On new installations, tape often falls off due to poor surface preparation, because ducts tend to be installed in dirty and dusty locations and conditions. On older systems, the tape falls off as it ages and the adhesive dries out and wrinkles. Instead of duct tape, seal ducts with mastic.

Myth: When my appliance is turned off, it’s off.

We’ve found that most devices continue to consume power when they’re switched off, sometimes as much power as when they’re on! A surprisingly large number of electrical products–from air conditioners to VCRs–cannot be switched completely off without unplugging the device. These products draw power 24 hours a day, often without the knowledge of the consumer. We call this power consumption standby power. One easy remedy for this is to unplug appliances when you are out of the house–easily done if many items are grouped together on one power strip.

Myth: Cleaning refrigerator coils saves energy.

While this seems intuitively logical, and very small savings may indeed arise, efforts to actually measure this effect have typically come up empty-handed. Cleaning coils is probably a good idea, especially if you want to cut down on dust and dirt buildup in your kitchen, but don’t expect lower utility bills from it.

Myth: Installing foam gaskets in electrical outlets will significantly reduce air leakage.

Measurements have shown that less than 1% of a home’s air leakage is due to outlets. However, a lot of little holes add up to one big hole. If you’re doing a thorough air sealing job, or you’re in a very big house with a lot of light switches, it wouldn’t hurt to install gaskets–but you might want to save this measure for last, in case you run out of time or energy.

Myth: Leaving lights, computers, and other appliances on uses less energy than turning them off and on repeatedly, and makes them last longer.

The small surge of power created when some devices are turned on is vastly smaller than the energy used by running the device when it’s not needed. While it used to be the case that cycling appliances and lighting on and off significantly reduced their useful lifetimes, these problems have been largely overcome through better design. The rule of thumb today is: Turn off the lights when you leave the room, and use the power-management software that comes with your computer and monitor.

Myth: Energy efficiency increases the first cost of houses.

While efficient products usually cost more, in some cases there may be little or no added initial cost. Most efficient products are also premium products (in terms of features, warranty, and so on), so it’s difficult to say that you are paying for the efficiency. In some instances, efficiency can even reduce first cost, as in the case where smaller, properly sized heating and cooling systems can be installed if they’re highly efficient. When homes are designed well and include such measures as passive solar lighting and heating measures, optimum-value engineering, correctly sized HVAC systems, high-tech windows, and shorter duct runs, up-front building costs often turn out to be about the same as those of conventional homes, while operating costs are significantly lower. What’s more, high-performance homes offer huge savings in terms of occupant comfort and safety, and reduced litigation and callbacks.

Myth: Insulating the ceiling will just cause more heat to leak out of the windows.

Adding insulation to one part of a home won’t increase the “pressure” on heat losses through other parts. However, it is true that poorly insulated areas will be the major losers of heat, and that they often merit attention before improving already well-insulated parts of the home. To best insulate a home, large and small leaks must be addressed.

Myth: Switching to electric room heaters will reduce your energy bill.

This is true only under some circumstances. If you have central electric heating, using individual room heaters may save you money, if you just run the heater in the room that you occupy. But if you have central gas heating (which is typically cheaper per unit of useful heat), you can easily match or even exceed your heating bill by switching to electrical units.

Myth: Fluorescent lighting is unhealthy.

Fluorescent lighting has changed dramatically in the last few years. Today’s fluorescents have greatly improved color quality. And the annoying flicker and hum have been eliminated from fluorescents that use electronic incandescent lighting. Because they require less electricity, fluorescents generate less power plant pollution, which has many known health effects. Fluorescent lights do contain small amounts of mercury and must be disposed of properly. However, additional mercury releases are avoided thanks to reduced use of mercury-containing fossil fuels used to generate electricity. If it’s been a while since you tried fluorescent lights, you might give them another chance. The oft sited claim of fluorescent lights “sapping people’s vitamins” and the like have no basis in fact.

Myth: Halogen lighting is superefficient.

It’s true that halogen lights use slightly less energy than standard incandescent bulbs, but many halogens require transformers that can use extra energy, even when the light is off. They also tend to put off a great deal of heat, which may add to the cooling load of a home during hot weather. Halogens can also pose a serious fire hazard. By comparison, compact fluorescent lights are nearly three times as efficient and put off far less heat. Many new models are dimmable, like halogens.

Myth: Electric heating is more efficient than fuel-based heating.

It’s true that all, or almost all, of the electricity that goes into an electric heater is transformed to useful heat in your home. However, making electricity is an inefficient process, with as much as two-thirds of the input energy (coal, natural gas, and so on) being lost in the process. This is why electricity is typically so much more expensive for the consumer than direct fuels. Don’t forget, though, that combustion appliances in the home must be installed and vented properly and must always have a continuous, reliable source of makeup air.

Reprinted with permission from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Web site (http://homeenergysaver.lbl.gov/hes/myths.html).

Posted Under: Energy Efficiency, Henry Bush | , , ,

Learn How To Save Energy At Your House

Energy Saving Home

The article below is from Home Energy Magazine.  I couldn’t agree with it more. We have come to these exact same conclusions in the homes in which we’ve done energy retrofits.

Article Link: (http://www.homeenergy.org/show/article/magazine/121/id/1735)

Bailey Family Earns Bragging Rights

BY DAVID H. BAILEY
November 02, 2011
November/December 2011
This article originally appeared in the November/December 2011issue of Home Energy Magazine.
SHARE

Our attempt to improve the energy efficiency of our home began in 2008, after the electrical portion of our utility bill soared over $400. We had long been resigned to a steep energy bill, in part because we have a 40-foot solar-heated swimming pool, which has to be filtered at least four or five hours per day even in winter. But this is still a lot of money! It was particularly galling that because of our high level of consumption, we were paying 39 per kilowatt-hour. But what could we do? Where was all the electricity going? There was no way to tell.

tr_Bailey_0379When we redid the kitchen, we replaced all the appliances. The new refrigerator, an LG Energy Star model, has an estimated utility cost of only $43 per year. (David Bailey) 

tr_Bailey_0367To our horror, we found that two computers in the den were using ridiculous amounts of electricity. (David Bailey)

Two developments led the way to saving electricity — and cash. First, in 2008, electrical costs at the Berkeley Lab’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center were rising steeply. The lab was considering installing inexpensive electric power meters to get a handle on electricity use. I thought one of these meters might be useful to monitor my family’s use of electricity. And second, at about the same time, our local utility, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) began to install SmartMeters. These meters allow customers to view hour-by-hour usage on the Internet, and thus identify potential trouble spots.

So in February 2009, we purchased a $22 Kill A Watt power meter from Amazon.com, and started measuring the amount of electricity used by our appliances and electronic devices. To our horror, we found that two computers in the den were using ridiculous amounts of electricity — my wife’s PC was using 250 watts around the clock, even when no one was using it, and a Mac workstation I had at home was using 225 watts around the clock. So we soon replaced my wife’s PC with a new energy-efficient laptop, and I shut off the Mac except when I really needed to use it. We found that this change alone saved us roughly $100 per month.

Another unpleasant surprise uncovered by our Kill A Watt meter was the refrigerator. We found that it was consuming about 2.4 kWh per day, which was costing us roughly $30 per month. As it turned out, in 2010 we had extensive water damage in our kitchen, when a rat ate the outlet hose of our dishwasher. So when we redid the kitchen, we replaced all the appliances. The new refrigerator, an LG Energy Star model, has an estimated utility cost of only $43 per year (it actually costs us roughly $5 per month, because our utility rate is higher than that assumed in the Energy Star estimate).

Better Viewing, Lower Energy Bills, and Less Pollution

More than 80% of U.S. homes subscribe to some form of pay-television service.

Transforming those signals into shows, movies, and sports on the screen currently depends on approximately 160 million set-top boxes, nearly all of which are owned and installed by the cable, satellite, phone, or other service provider. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), where I work, and Ecos Consulting partnered to better understand how much energy these devices use and how they might be used more efficiently. What we found was startling: In 2010, set-top boxes in the United States consumed approximately 27,000,000,000 kWh of electricity, which is equivalent to the annual output of nine average (500 MW) coal-fired power plants. The electricity required to operate all U.S. boxes is equal to the annual household electricity consumption of the entire state of Maryland, results in 16 million metric tons of CO2 emissions, and costs households more than $3 billion each year. Fortunately, there is great potential for improving the efficiency and reducing the cost of operating these electronics that so many viewers rely upon.

Here are the key findings of the NRDC and Ecos study:

There are approximately 160 million set-top boxes installed in U.S. homes. Almost all of these boxes are owned and installed by the service provider. Today’s set-top boxes operate at near full power even when the consumer is neither watching nor recording a show. As a nation, we spend $2 billion each year to power these boxes when they are not being actively used.

Digital video recorders (DVRs) are growing in popularity and frequently replace set-top boxes without recording capability. DVRs typically use around 40% more energy per year than their non-DVR counterparts.

Better-designed pay-TV set-top boxes could reduce the energy use of the already-installed base of boxes by 30 – 50% by 2020. The big opportunities include: (a) shifting to whole-home solutions that include a main box connected to the primary TV with either TVs specially designed to access the video content stored on the main box or low-power thin client boxes that serve the same function, and (b) having the boxes automatically power down to much lower power levels when not in use (for example, in the middle of the night, or while users are at work).

— Noah Horowitz
Noah Horowitz is a senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, and director of the Center for Energy Efficiency, San Francisco, California.

One more surprise uncovered by our Kill A Watt meter was our cable/digital video recorder (DVR) box. These devices consume a lot of electricity even when they are switched off (see “Better Viewing, Lower Energy Bills, and Less Pollution”). On or off, ours was consuming 28 watts around the clock. So we plugged all our video equipment, including our new LED flat-screen TV and the cable/DVR box, into a power strip and shut the power strip off when we weren’t using the equipment. Now when we switch the equipment on, it takes 30 seconds or so before we can watch TV, but we are willing to make this onerous sacrifice for the sake of energy efficiency (wink).

The Bailey’s Monthly Electric Bill

The Bailey's Monthly Electric BillFigure 1. We cut the electrical portion of our PG&E bill from about $400 per month three years ago to only about $50 per month today.

We had long suspected that our swimming pool filter pump was costing us plenty, but we couldn’t measure its usage with the Kill A Watt meter (which works only for items with a standard electrical plug). However, when PG&E installed a SmartMeter on our property, we were able to see how much power the pump was using each day, and concluded that it was costing us roughly $100 per month. So after consulting with our pool service company, we replaced it with a new ultraefficient, multispeed pump. This now costs us only about $25 per month.

One more change was to replace all 38 ceiling can lights in our house with LED can fixtures (manufactured by Cree, Incorporated, and now available at Home Depot). These are a nice true white color, are dimmable, and what’s more, screw into standard can sockets. These were relatively expensive, but we should recoup the cost in five years.

The bottom line is that we have cut the electrical portion of our PG&E bill from about $400 per month three years ago to only about $50 per month today — plus or minus some blips here and there due to unusual events such as family get-togethers or remodel crews (see Figure 1).

>> learn more

For more information on the NRDC and Ecos study, please contact Noah Horowitz at nhorowitz@nrdc.org, or on the web atwww.switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/nhorowitz.

Here is the complete list, in chronological order, of the changes we made in our house:

  • February 2, 2009. Purchased a Kill A Watt power meter; started measuring usage.
  • February 10, 2009. Turned off the Mac workstation when not in use.
  • May 9, 2009. Purchased a new PC laptop.
  • March 31, 2010. Replaced the washer/dryer with new models.
  • July 2, 2010. Replaced the pool pump with new multispeed model.
  • December 13, 2010. Replaced kitchen ceiling lighting with LED cans, as part of kitchen remodel.
  • December 15, 2010. Replaced TV with 40-inch LED backlit model; installed Comcast digital TV service.
  • December 22, 2010. Installed power strip to turn off Comcast DVR box and other TV equipment when not in use.
  • January 7, 2011. Replaced den ceiling lighting with LED cans.
  • January 19, 2011. Replaced dishwasher, microwave, and stove/oven (the latter with an induction cooktop), as part of kitchen remodel.
  • February 3, 2011. Replaced refrigerator, as part of kitchen remodel.
  • April 23, 2011. Replaced ceiling lighting in remaining rooms with LED cans.

David H. Bailey is the chief technologist of the Computational Research Department at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. He does research in the area of large-scale scientific computing and computational mathematics.

This short article was submitted to Home Energy by David H. Bailey, a scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, in response to Senior Executive Editor Alan Meier’s recent editorial (July/Aug ’11, p. 2), which featured the home of another building scientist and frequent Home Energy contributor, Danny Parker of the Florida Solar Energy Center. Come on, you readers out there, don’t let the scientists hog all the spotlight! Write toJPGunshinan@homeenergy.org and brag about your energy-saving retrofit measures. Or be really brave and tell us about your failures. All data are good!

 

 

 

 

Posted Under: Energy Efficiency, Henry Bush | , ,

Infrared Photos From Yesterday’s Energy Audit

Air leaking through a switchplate

Yesterday we ran down the road to Mission Viejo to do an energy audit. It was a beautiful spring day in Orange County, which meant that there wasn’t a great deal of difference between the outdoor temperature and the indoor temperature of this couple’s beautiful home. We were a little concerned that the thermal imaging camera that we use would not get the best pictures because of this small temperature differential. Thankfully, that worry was all for naught. We got some very good photos of problems in this house. These are fairly typical in the houses that we see.

You can see where the insulation has been compromised around this switch plate. The house was negatively pressurized for this photo allowing you to see air move from the wall to the room. Read More

Posted Under: Energy Efficiency, Heating & Air, Henry Bush | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why Would Google Be Making A LED Light Bulb?

Google LED Lightbulb

A few years ago I fell in love with the Google Android platform when I switched from my Blackberry to a Google Droid phone. I loved all of the apps that were being written for the phone because of the fact that Google is such a champion of open source. So when I saw a post, this  morning, on Google teaming up with Lighting Science Group to come out with a LED light bulb with a built in chip allowing it to be controlled from my Android powered phone or my Android powered tablet or my Android Powered Google TV (did I mention that I am a fan of Android), I was totally intrigued.

What may seem like overkill at first, could open up some amazing possibilities. Out of the box you will be able to turn this light off and on, as well as dim it, from your Android powered device. It will screw right into your existing socket from which you just took out an incandescent light bulb and it will sip energy by comparison that that heat producing beast that was in there before.

So, you could turn off the light that you accidentally left on when you left for work, from your desk. You could flip on the light for security purposes if you are coming home late. And you could dim it when it comes time for some romantic ambiance. Those are all basics, and it might be hard to justify the price that these bulbs will demand ( at first) when they come out in December. Yep, they’ll be cool, but will they be worth it, goes the argument.

I would suggest, that these could open up a whole other realm of possibilities though. How long will it be before some enterprising person writes an app that allows me to create banks of lighting that are all controlled as one? So, I might be able to create a bank of can lighting in the living room that changes for entertaining, verses mood lighting, reading, or security. High end lighting systems exist for this already, but they are controlled by systems that cost thousands and are usually cost prohibitive in retrofit applications. Could Google lighting make those systems obsolete? Could I have random lights come on at random times all around the house to make it look like someone is home when I am in Hawaii? Could I turn off my kitchen light from my couch with my Google TV remote? Is there an app that some one will write that finally gets my kids to shut off the lights in their room when they are not in it (I’ve tried motion detector switches with limited success so far).  What else could they do that I haven’t even though of yet?

It is interesting to me that Google is getting into the energy business. What other appliances will I be able to control with my Droid phone. Like I said, I am an unabashed fan of the Android platform and technology in general. But, when you combine them with energy savings, I just get get giddie. Below are some more details on the announcement. What do you think about all this? Feel free to comment.

By Andrew Nusca | May 10, 2011, 11:39 AM PDT Internet giant Google and LED manufacturer Lighting Science Group on Tuesday revealed that they have partnered to develop an LED light bulb that can be controlled from an Android-powered smartphone. The Florida-based lighting firm calls it “intelligent LED lighting,” and announced it with Google during the company’s keynote presentation at its I/O developer conference in San Francisco. The first product, a 60-watt equivalent bulb, is a combination of Lighting Science’s knowledge of light geometry and Google’s connected software know-how. An Internet-connected LED bulb? Yes, and here’s why: with a little help from your home’s Wi-Fi network, you can dim or turn off lights remotely — or to program them to do so. Better still, the LED bulbs can leverage your smartphone’s GPS and proximity sensors, turning on lights when you walk into a room with the phone in your pocket. Google has always occupied the home area network space, but this is the first time it has addressed a specific appliance in the home. (If you’re an avid reader of SmartPlanet, you’ll know that the “Internet of Things” — from cars to water heaters to toasters to yes, light bulbs — is just around the corner.) It’s not just a consumer play, but a commercial one, too. Networked lighting companies such as Adura, Lumenergi, Redwood Systems and others — Google rival Microsoft’s focus on commercial building management comes to mind — deal primarily with office buildings and datacenters; this announcement hints at similar applications. The companies say the product will arrive in retail stores this fall.

Posted Under: Energy Efficiency | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,